Example report

Visibility report: Example Ltd

Metal fabrication

Domain: example-company.com Checked: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity

This report shows a complete example with invented but realistic content for a fictional company. It illustrates the structure and depth of a real Zitierbar report — no real company, no real measurements.

Executive summary

Example Ltd (metal fabrication: CNC milling, laser cutting, welded assemblies) is not findable by name with any of the four assistants checked. Perplexity's sources include the domain, but the answer itself does not cite it.

The website has no structured data for AI crawlers: no FAQ schema, no llms.txt, no Organization markup. The visible body text is also thin — the four assistants simply have too little machine-readable material to cite Example Ltd.

How the four assistants answer today

We ask the kind of question a buyer or design engineer would ask, and record the answer verbatim.

ChatGPT not mentioned

Question

„Which metal fabrication shop offers CNC milling and laser cutting under one roof?“

Answer

There are several specialized providers for CNC milling and laser cutting. Such shops often combine sheet metal work with welded assemblies. A more specific location would help narrow down a concrete recommendation.

Gap

Example Ltd offers exactly this range of services but is not mentioned — ChatGPT gives an evasive answer instead of a concrete recommendation.

Claude not mentioned

Question

„Who manufactures welded assemblies to drawing for machine building?“

Answer

Specialized metal fabrication shops are a good fit for welded assemblies to drawing, often certified to EN 1090. Without further details I cannot name a specific provider.

Gap

The answer stays generic. Example Ltd does not come up as an option, even though its service range matches.

Gemini not mentioned

Question

„CNC milling small batches provider Germany“

Answer

There are numerous providers for CNC milling of small batches in Germany, including specialized machining shops and larger contract manufacturers. The choice depends on material, tolerances, and batch size.

Gap

Gemini gives a general overview without naming a specific provider — Example Ltd is entirely absent from the answer.

Perplexity mentioned, no source

Question

„metal fabrication laser cutting sheet metal company“

Answer

Several companies offer laser cutting for sheet metal [1][2]. Mostly larger, nationally known providers with a strong online presence are named.

Gap

Example Ltd's domain appears in one of the source links, but the company name is not mentioned in the answer itself — no citable hit.

Findings in detail

Six concrete gaps, each with the reasoning and the exact technical implementation.

Critical

No FAQ schema in place

Why it matters: AI assistants preferentially extract answers from FAQPage markup. Without that signal, existing content is largely skipped for customer questions.

The fix: Add FAQPage JSON-LD with the most common customer questions.

faqpage.jsonld
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "Does Example Ltd offer CNC milling for small batches?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Yes. Example Ltd manufactures CNC-milled parts in small batches from lot size 1, including drawing review."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "Does Example Ltd manufacture welded assemblies to EN 1090?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Yes, Example Ltd is certified to EN 1090 and manufactures welded assemblies to customer drawing."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>
High

llms.txt missing entirely

Why it matters: Without llms.txt, AI crawlers must interpret content themselves and do so inconsistently. With llms.txt they get a machine-readable summary.

The fix: Provide an llms.txt with services, location, and contact.

llms.txt
# Example Ltd
> Metal fabrication: CNC milling, laser cutting, and welded assemblies to drawing, from lot size 1, certified to EN 1090.

## Services
- CNC milling (small batches and single parts)
- Laser cutting of sheet metal
- Welded assemblies to EN 1090
- Sub-assembly work

## Location
12 Example Street, 12345 Example City, Germany — info@example-company.com

## Key pages
- Services: https://example-company.com/services
- Contact: https://example-company.com/contact
High

No Organization markup

Why it matters: Without structured entity data, the AI cannot reliably attribute name, address, and contact to the company and tends to cite clearer sources instead.

The fix: Add Organization JSON-LD with name, address, phone, and e-mail.

organization.jsonld
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Organization",
  "@id": "https://example-company.com/#organization",
  "name": "Example Ltd",
  "url": "https://example-company.com",
  "email": "info@example-company.com",
  "address": {
    "@type": "PostalAddress",
    "streetAddress": "12 Example Street",
    "postalCode": "12345",
    "addressLocality": "Example City",
    "addressCountry": "DE"
  }
}
</script>
Medium

Thin extractable text on the homepage

Why it matters: The homepage consists mostly of image tiles and slogans rather than body text. AI models extract facts from text, not images.

The fix: Add at least 300–400 words of descriptive body text about services and processes.

Medium

Services not machine-readable individually

Why it matters: “CNC milling,” “laser cutting,” and “welded assemblies” exist only as menu entries, not structured entries — the AI cannot reliably match them to specific queries.

The fix: Create a separate Service JSON-LD object for each service.

Low

robots.txt has no explicit AI crawler allowances

Why it matters: Without explicit Allow rules, some AI crawlers behave conservatively and crawl the site less often.

The fix: Add explicit Allow entries for GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, and Google-Extended to robots.txt.

robots-addition.txt
# --- Explicitly allow AI/LLM crawlers (GEO) ---
User-agent: GPTBot
Allow: /
User-agent: ClaudeBot
Allow: /
User-agent: PerplexityBot
Allow: /
User-agent: Google-Extended
Allow: /

What we implement — and what your IT team can roll out

Both packages include the same audit and the same ready-made building blocks. The difference is who rolls them out.

Package without rollout

€990

  • Full GEO audit with all findings
  • Ready-to-use JSON-LD snippets (FAQ, Organization, Services)
  • Ready-to-use llms.txt and robots.txt additions
  • Step-by-step instructions for your CMS
  • Your IT team rolls out the building blocks

Package with rollout

€1,390

  • Everything from the package without rollout
  • We roll out all building blocks directly (CMS access via staff invitation)
  • We check the integration with the Rich Results Test
  • We verify after rollout: do the assistants pick up the new content?

How we measure

We repeatedly put the same customer questions, agreed with you, to ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity, and record verbatim whether and how your business is mentioned — including the source when there is one.

“We show progress, we don't promise placement.”

Where does your business stand?

Start your own free visibility test — results typically within one working day.

Start free visibility test